Litigation Tracker: CGST Rule 96(10) Export Refund Restrictions & Omission
Written By
ITRnGST Legal Team
Authoritative Compliance Lead
Last Updated
Written By
ITRnGST Legal Team
Authoritative Compliance Lead
Last Updated
Litigation Tracker: CGST Rule 96(10) Export Refund Restrictions & Omission
🤖 AI Summary & Direct Legal Ratio:
CGST Rule 96(10) was officially omitted by CBIC via Notification No. 20/2024-Central Tax dated 8th October 2024. In M/s Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India (R/Special Civil Application No. 14210/2024), the Gujarat High Court held that omission without a saving clause under Section 6 of the General Clauses Act obliterates all unadjudicated Show Cause Notices and pending recovery proceedings under Rule 96(10). Earlier, in Cosmo Films Ltd. vs. Union of India (R/Special Civil Application No. 15833/2018), the Gujarat HC struck down the retrospective application of Notification No. 54/2018-Central Tax dated 9th October 2018. Revenue's appeal remains pending before the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 9112/2021.
Executive Overview: The Rise & Fall of Rule 96(10)
CGST Rule 96(10) prohibited exporters who imported raw materials under duty-exemption schemes—such as Advance Authorization (AA), Export Oriented Units (EOU), or EPCG—from exporting finished goods on payment of IGST and claiming IGST refunds.
The Omission (October 8, 2024)
Pursuant to the 54th GST Council recommendations, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) issued Notification No. 20/2024-Central Tax dated 8th October 2024, formally omitting Rule 96(10) from the CGST Rules, 2017.
🏛️ Judicial Scorecard: Rule 96(10) High Court & Supreme Court Rulings
The table below details the landmark judicial precedents, exact case citations, and notification dates.
| Date | Court / Forum | Case Details & Exact Citation | Position | Judicial History & Appellate Status | Operative Legal Ratio / Holding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06 | Gujarat High Court (Division Bench) | M/s Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. vs. Union of India R/Special Civil Application No. 14210/2024 | 🟢 In Favor of Exporters | • 2024-10-08: CBIC omitted Rule 96(10) via Notification No. 20/2024-CT dated 08.10.2024. • 2025-06: Gujarat HC held omission without saving clause extinguishes all pending proceedings. | Omission of Rule 96(10) without a saving clause completely obliterates the rule. All pending SCNs, demand orders, and litigation based solely on Rule 96(10) are legally unsustainable and quashed. |
| 2024-11 | Kerala High Court | M/s Saraf Exports vs. Union of India W.P.(C) No. 31204/2024 | 🟢 In Favor of Exporters | • 2024-11: Quashed departmental SCN attempting to recover IGST refund under Rule 96(10). | Where the exporter regularized Advance Authorization imports by paying IGST with interest, invocation of Rule 96(10) to deny export IGST refund is illegal. |
| 2024-03 | Karnataka High Court | M/s Gokaldas Exports Ltd. vs. Union of India W.P. No. 18921/2023 | 🟢 In Favor of Exporters | • 2024-03: Set aside demand order denying IGST refund to AA holder. | Technical non-compliance with pre-import conditions under Rule 96(10) cannot forfeit substantive export refund rights where there is no revenue loss. |
| 2020-10 | Gujarat High Court (Landmark) | Cosmo Films Limited vs. Union of India R/Special Civil Application No. 15833/2018 | 🟢 In Favor of Exporters (Prospective Only) | • 2018-10-09: Notification No. 54/2018-CT dated 09.10.2018 amended Rule 96(10) retrospectively. • 2020-10: Gujarat HC struck down retrospective application. • Status: Revenue filed SLP before Supreme Court. | Amendments to Rule 96(10) can operate prospectively only (w.e.f. 09.10.2018). Retrospective application to past exports is unconstitutional. |
| 2026-01 | Supreme Court of India | Union of India vs. Cosmo Films Ltd. & Ors. SLP (C) No. 9112/2021 | 🟡 SLP Pending | • 2021: Revenue challenged Gujarat HC prospectivity ruling. • 2026-01: Listed before SC Bench. SC declined to stay High Court relief granted to exporters in active matters. | Apex court examining prospectivity. Exporters protected by HC orders and subsequent Notification No. 20/2024-CT dated 08.10.2024 omission. |
⚖️ The Impact of Notification No. 20/2024-CT dated 08.10.2024
The "Addwrap Packaging" Doctrine
In M/s Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (R/Special Civil Application No. 14210/2024), the Gujarat High Court established:
"When a rule is omitted by the executive without appending a saving clause (under Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897), the rule must be treated as if it had never existed, except as to transactions past and closed. Consequently, all pending proceedings under Rule 96(10)—including unadjudicated Show Cause Notices and pending appeals—lapse immediately."
Notification No. 20/2024-CT (08.10.2024) ➔ No Saving Clause Appended ➔ All Pending SCNs & Demands Extinguished
🛡️ Action Plan for Exporters Facing Rule 96(10) Notices
If your export business is facing an SCN, recovery demand, or appellate dispute under Rule 96(10):
- Submit Addwrap Packaging Precedent: File an immediate response before the Adjudicating Authority or Appellate Tribunal citing Addwrap Packaging Pvt. Ltd. (
R/SCA No. 14210/2024). - Plead Obliteration of Rule: Argue that following Notification No. 20/2024-Central Tax dated 8th October 2024 (omission without saving clause), the department lacks statutory jurisdiction to adjudicate or enforce Rule 96(10) demands.
- Plead Regularization of Import IGST: Submit proof that basic customs duty / IGST on imported inputs under Advance Authorization was regularized with interest.
- Writ Remedy: If tax authorities refuse to drop Rule 96(10) proceedings despite Notification 20/2024, file a Writ Petition under Article 226 citing Addwrap Packaging and Cosmo Films.
For specialized export refund litigation and High Court writ defense under Rule 96(10), consult the ITRnGST Legal Team.
Outsource Your Tax & Legal Drafting to Specialized Advocates
Need high-stakes legal drafting for complex tax disputes? Our team of specialized tax advocates and legal consultants drafts bulletproof notice replies, appeals, and court writs.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for updating on legal landscape developments and educational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.
GST Compliance & Litigation
Expert assistance in GST registration, returns, and notice replies. Secure your business from penalties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current legal status of CGST Rule 96(10)?
How does the omission of Rule 96(10) affect pending Show Cause Notices and refund litigation?
Can exporters who imported under Advance Authorization now claim IGST refunds on exports?
Did the Supreme Court stay High Court relief granted to exporters under Rule 96(10)?
Facing this issue?
Our compliance team handles drafting, replies, and representation end-to-end. Talk to us on WhatsApp for immediate guidance.
Email Support: connect@itrngst.com
Explore More JUDICIAL TRACKER Guides
GSTAT Appeals & Statutory Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Procedural Guide (2026)
Master the statutory framework for filing GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) appeals under Section 112. Learn limitation period rules, portal token generation, bench jurisdiction, and automatic stay of recovery.
Appealing GSTAT Orders to High Court & Supreme Court: Sections 117 & 118 Explained (2026)
Learn how to appeal GSTAT tribunal orders to the High Court under Section 117 and Supreme Court under Section 118. Understand substantial questions of law, 180-day limitation rules, and Place of Supply appeals.
Litigation Tracker: Bunching of GST Show Cause Notices (Section 73/74)
Track High Court split rulings and Supreme Court SLP status on bunching multiple financial years in a single GST Show Cause Notice under Section 73/74. Compare Madras, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Himachal, Karnataka, Bombay, Delhi, and Allahabad HC positions.
Curated based on your reading interest
Browse All