Litigation Tracker: Validity of Section 168A GST Limitation Notifications
Written By
ITRnGST Legal Team
Authoritative Compliance Lead
Last Updated
Written By
ITRnGST Legal Team
Authoritative Compliance Lead
Last Updated
Litigation Tracker: Validity of Section 168A GST Limitation Notifications
🤖 AI Summary & Direct Legal Ratio:
Under Section 168A of the CGST Act, 2017, statutory limitation periods can only be extended when compliance is prevented by genuine "force majeure" conditions. High Courts are divided: The Madras High Court (Faiveley TransportW.P. No. 10921/2025) struck down Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December 2023 as ultra vires Section 168A (invoking force majeure post-COVID without fresh triggers is illegal). The Gujarat High Court (SRSS AgroR/SCA No. 3412/2026) granted interim stays. Conversely, the Allahabad High Court (Graziano TrasmissioniWrit Tax No. 892/2025) and Kerala High Court (Southern GranitesW.P.(C) No. 22104/2025) upheld government discretion. The issue is now pending before the Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) No. 1102/2026.
Executive Summary & Legal Controversy
Under Section 168A of the CGST Act, 2017, the government is empowered to extend statutory limitation periods for issuing Show Cause Notices (SCNs) and adjudication orders under Section 73, subject to the presence of "force majeure" conditions.
Relevant Notifications & Dates
- Notification No. 13/2022-Central Tax dated 5th July 2022: Extended limitation for FY 2017-18.
- Notification No. 09/2023-Central Tax dated 31st March 2023: Extended limitation for FY 2017-18, FY 2018-19, and FY 2019-20.
- Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax dated 28th December 2023: Further extended Section 73 limitation for FY 2018-19 (up to 30.04.2024) and FY 2019-20 (up to 31.08.2024).
🏛️ High Court & Supreme Court Judicial Scorecard: Section 168A
The table below tracks the judicial split across High Courts and Supreme Court SLP status with exact case numbers and notification dates.
| Date | Court / Forum | Case Details & Exact Citation | Position | Judicial History & Appellate Trail | Operative Legal Ratio / Holding |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04 | Madras High Court (Division Bench) | M/s Faiveley Transport vs. Union of India W.P. No. 10921/2025 | 🟢 In Favor of Taxpayer | • 2024: Single Bench struck down Notification No. 56/2023-CT dated 28.12.2023. • 2026-04: Division Bench affirmed post-COVID extensions without force majeure are ultra vires. | Section 168A cannot be used as a routine extension tool. Invoking force majeure without actual pandemic conditions violates Section 168A statutory boundaries. |
| 2026-03 | Gujarat High Court | M/s SRSS Agro Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India R/Special Civil Application No. 3412/2026 & New India Acid | 🟢 Interim Stay Granted | • 2026-03: Issued notice & granted interim stay halting final orders for FY 2018-19 under Notification No. 56/2023-CT dated 28.12.2023. | Prima facie case established regarding lack of force majeure trigger under Section 168A post-2022. |
| 2026-02 | Punjab & Haryana High Court | M/s Garg Enterprises vs. State of Punjab CWP No. 4110/2026 | 🟢 Interim Relief Granted | • 2026-02: Stayed enforcement of summary demand (DRC-07) passed under Notification No. 56/2023-CT dated 28.12.2023. | Impugned adjudication order passed under Notification 56/2023 subject to final outcome of Section 168A validity challenge. |
| 2026-01 | Supreme Court of India | M/s HCC-SEW-MEIL-AAG JV vs. Asst. Commr. SLP (C) No. 1102/2026 | 🟡 SLP Pending | • 2025: Divergent rulings between Allahabad/Patna HC vs Madras HC. • 2026-01: Supreme Court admitted SLP to resolve national cleavage of opinion. | Pending final Supreme Court determination. Interim stay against coercive recovery maintained in active matters. |
| 2025-05 | Allahabad High Court (Landmark) | M/s Graziano Trasmissioni & Ors. vs. State of UP Writ Tax No. 892/2025 | 🔴 In Favor of Revenue (Conditional) | • 2024: Petitions filed challenging Notification No. 13/2022-CT dated 05.07.2022 & Notification No. 09/2023-CT dated 31.03.2023. • 2025-05: Upheld executive power to extend limitation based on GST Council recommendations, but restricted coercive recovery. | Section 168A grants power to extend time limits upon GST Council recommendation. Adjudication may proceed, but coercive enforcement barred if natural justice is impaired. |
| 2025-09 | Kerala High Court | M/s Southern Granites vs. State Tax Officer W.P.(C) No. 22104/2025 | 🔴 In Favor of Revenue | • 2025-09: Upheld Notification No. 09/2023-CT dated 31.03.2023. | Government holds executive discretion under Section 168A to determine time extensions based on GST Council recommendations. |
⚖️ Strategic Defense for Taxpayers
If your business faces an SCN or Order-in-Original issued under extended Section 168A timelines (e.g. FY 2018-19 or 2019-20 orders passed in 2024):
- Raise Limitation & Jurisdiction Objections: Explicitly plead that Notification No. 56/2023-CT dated 28.12.2023 and Notification No. 09/2023-CT dated 31.03.2023 are ultra vires Section 168A.
- Cite Madras & Gauhati HC Precedents: Rely on Faiveley Transport (
W.P. No. 10921/2025) and SRSS Agro (R/SCA No. 3412/2026). - Keep Appellate Rights Open: Ensure that appeals before GSTAT or High Court contain specific grounds challenging the Section 168A extension window.
For expert representation challenging Section 168A time-barred notices, consult the ITRnGST Legal Team.
Outsource Your Tax & Legal Drafting to Specialized Advocates
Need high-stakes legal drafting for complex tax disputes? Our team of specialized tax advocates and legal consultants drafts bulletproof notice replies, appeals, and court writs.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for updating on legal landscape developments and educational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice.
GST Compliance & Litigation
Expert assistance in GST registration, returns, and notice replies. Secure your business from penalties.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Allahabad High Court stance in Graziano Trasmissioni on Section 168A?
Which High Courts have struck down or stayed Section 168A notifications?
What is the Supreme Court status on Section 168A limitation extensions?
Facing this issue?
Our compliance team handles drafting, replies, and representation end-to-end. Talk to us on WhatsApp for immediate guidance.
Email Support: connect@itrngst.com
Explore More JUDICIAL TRACKER Guides
Litigation Tracker: Bunching of GST Show Cause Notices (Section 73/74)
Track High Court split rulings and Supreme Court SLP status on bunching multiple financial years in a single GST Show Cause Notice under Section 73/74. Compare Madras, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Himachal, Karnataka, Bombay, Delhi, and Allahabad HC positions.
Litigation Tracker: CGST Rule 96(10) Export Refund Restrictions & Omission
Track High Court judgments and Supreme Court SLP status on CGST Rule 96(10) export refund restrictions, Notification No. 20/2024-CT dated 08.10.2024 omission without saving clause, and Addwrap Packaging & Cosmo Films rulings.
Litigation Tracker: GST Portal "Additional Notices" Tab & Ex-Parte Orders
Track High Court rulings quashing ex-parte GST assessment orders passed due to SCNs uploaded under the hidden "Additional Notices & Orders" portal tab without email/SMS alerts.
Curated based on your reading interest
Browse All